
Libel is the permanent/written form of a defamatory statement. If a statement about a person is defamatory it tends to do any one of the following:
- expose them to hatred or ridicule
- causes them to be shunned or avoided
- discredits them in their trade, business
- generally lowers them in the eyes of right thinking members of society.
Case one:
In 2001 Dr Joe Rahamim, a surgeon at Derriford Hospital in Plymouth, sued Channel 4 and ITN for defamation.
In July 1998 Channel 4 News broadcast the following:
1. " First that Mr. Rahamim was probably responsible for the death or serious injury of many of his patients including two who had died during their operations.
2. Secondly that Mr Rahamim was not competent to practice as a consultant thoracic surgeon and that he was seriously under qualified and inadequately trained.
3. Thirdly that he had fraudulently obtained his post as a Consultant by misrepresenting his qualifications and employment history.
4. Fourthly that Mr. Rahamim had dishonestly sent out letters to local GP’s in which he had falsely described himself as an FRCS
5. Fifthly that he had dishonestly concealed from his employers the fact that as a result of injuries sustained in a road accident he was unable to operate safely and
6. Lastly that by reason of these matters the GMC ought to have Mr. Rahamim struck off."
(http://www.scts.org/doc/2026)The surgeon believed that the news programme defamed him and was an unnessary attack on his professional and personal reputation.
Dr Joe Rahamim won his case and Channel 4 had to pay £100,000 in damages along with ITN who paid £75,000. They also had to cover his legal fees which were estimated to be £750,000! As well as this Channel 4 had to broadcast a retraction and apology on Channel 4 News.
Case two:
Britney Spears attempted to sue a US magazine (US Weekly) for $10 million in 2005 for libel after it had printed an article claiming that she and her husband (at the time) had made a sex tape.

The magazine reported that Britney was worried that "an x-rated tape starring the two of them might go public". It also reported that the couple showed the tape to their lawyers and "were acting goofy" when watching it with them.
Spears filed the suit after the magazine refused to print a retraction.
However the case was dropped as the judge ruled that the article wasn't defamatory and stated that "the plaintiff herself has put her modern sexuality squarely, and profitably, before the public eye."
She also pointed out how Spears and her husband had broadcast footage of themselves in the shower and often discussed sex throughout their reality television show "Choatic".
In this case Britney Spears' reputation was deemed unaffected by the printed article and so she lost her case.